Does a grant reduce the capital allowances on solar panels?
5 min read · Updated 2026-09-16 · Grants & funding
Yes — the part of a solar project a public grant pays for does not qualify for capital allowances. How the rule works, a worked example, and what it means for finance.
Quick answer: Yes. If a public body pays part of the cost of a solar system, you cannot claim capital allowances on that part — only on the portion you funded yourself. A grant is still valuable, but for a profitable business it is worth less than its face value, so it should be compared after tax.
Most guidance on business solar treats grants and tax relief as two separate piles of money you simply add together. They are not separate. The two interact, and the interaction is worth understanding before you let a grant application shape the timing or structure of a project.
The rule in one sentence
Under the Capital Allowances Act 2001, where expenditure on plant has been met — directly or indirectly — by a contribution from a public body, that expenditure is treated as not having been incurred by you, so it cannot attract capital allowances. The rule sits in the Act’s contributions provisions, at section 532. The same section can also catch contributions from other parties, such as a landlord, so tell your accountant about any third-party contribution.
Solar PV is plant, and it is special-rate expenditure, so on the part you fund yourself it normally qualifies for the Annual Investment Allowance at 100% on up to £1m of spend a year, with companies able to claim the 50% first-year allowance above that. What the rule changes is the base those allowances apply to.
A worked example
The figures below are illustrative, and the grant percentage is hypothetical rather than the rate of any real scheme. A company paying the 25% main rate of corporation tax installs a £100,000 system.
| Without a grant | With a 30% grant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant received | £0 | £30,000 |
| Cost the company funds | £100,000 | £70,000 |
| Expenditure qualifying for allowances | £100,000 | £70,000 |
| Tax saved at 25% | £25,000 | £17,500 |
| Net cost after grant and tax | £75,000 | £52,500 |
The grant improves the net position by £22,500 rather than £30,000, because £7,500 of tax relief disappears with it. Put another way, for a company at the 25% rate a grant is worth about 75p in the pound after tax.
That is still a clear improvement. The point is not that grants are bad — it is that the true value of a grant is the after-tax figure, and that is the number to set against the cost of waiting for a funding round, the conditions attached, and the energy savings you lose while the project is on hold.
When the numbers point the other way
For most profitable businesses, a genuinely open grant is worth taking. But a few situations deserve a second look:
- The grant forces a delay. If a scheme requires you to apply and wait for approval before ordering equipment, every month of delay is a month of electricity savings you do not get. On a system saving several thousand pounds a month, a slow application can cost more than the after-tax value of a small grant.
- The conditions restrict what you can do later. Some grants require you to keep the equipment for a set period, or claw funding back if you sell or refinance it. That can close off a later sale-and-leaseback or change of ownership.
- The business is not paying much tax. Allowances are only as valuable as the tax they save. A business with losses or low profits loses less relief when a grant reduces its qualifying expenditure, which makes the grant relatively more valuable.
How finance fits around a grant
A grant rarely covers the whole project, so the balance is usually funded with cash or finance — and the finance route decides who claims allowances on that balance.
- Hire purchase and equipment loans. You are treated as the owner, so you claim allowances on the part you fund, and the finance simply spreads the payment.
- Leases. The funder normally claims the allowances — for panels fixed to your building this needs a joint election with you — unless the lease is a long funding lease, broadly a finance-type lease of more than seven years or any sale and finance leaseback, in which case you claim them. Check whether the grant scheme requires you to own the equipment, because some do.
- Power purchase agreements. A third party owns the system, so neither the grant rules nor the allowances work in the same way for you — you buy electricity rather than an asset.
If you are exploring what is available before choosing a route, our guide to solar grants for business explains how to find a scheme that is genuinely open and how to check its conditions. For the allowances themselves, see our capital allowances guide, and for how each finance route treats ownership, compare hire purchase and the finance lease.
What to have ready
When a grant is involved, your accountant will want:
- the installer’s invoice, split between qualifying equipment and any other works;
- the grant offer letter, showing what the grant was paid towards and any conditions;
- the date and amount of the grant actually received; and
- the finance agreement for the balance, if you are not paying cash.
With those in hand, the allowances claim reflects only the expenditure you actually bore, and there are no surprises when the tax return is prepared.
The bottom line
A grant and capital allowances are not additive. The part of your solar project a public grant pays for does not qualify for allowances, so a grant is worth its after-tax value, not its headline figure. Take a genuinely open grant when the timing and conditions work, fund the balance in the way that keeps the allowances where they are most valuable, and compare the whole package in pounds before you commit.
Frequently asked questions
Can I claim capital allowances on the part of my solar system a grant paid for?
No. Where a public body contributes to the cost of plant, the contributed part is treated as expenditure you did not incur, so it does not qualify for capital allowances. You claim on the portion you paid for yourself.
Is a grant still worth having if it reduces my allowances?
Usually, yes. A grant is cash you do not repay, whereas allowances reduce tax at your marginal rate. For a company paying corporation tax at the 25% main rate, each pound of grant removes about 25p of tax relief, so the grant is worth roughly three-quarters of its face value after tax. It is still worth weighing against any conditions it attaches and any delay it causes.
Does the Smart Export Guarantee count as a grant for capital allowances?
No. Smart Export Guarantee payments are income from electricity you export, paid over time by the SEG licensee you sign up with, which need not be your electricity supplier. They are not a contribution towards the cost of buying the system, so they do not reduce the expenditure you claim allowances on.
What should I tell my accountant?
Give them the installer's invoice, the grant offer letter and the date and amount of any grant paid, together with the finance agreement if you are funding the balance. The offer letter matters because it shows exactly what the grant was paid towards.
Read next
- Public-sector solar finance: Salix and beyond — How UK public bodies fund solar in 2026 — what Salix does and does not offer, why PSDS has closed, and PPAs and leasing where capital is constrained.
- Smart Export Guarantee for business solar — How the Smart Export Guarantee works for commercial solar — who keeps the export income, typical rates, and why ownership matters.
- Funding for solar panels: UK business options 2026 — Funding for solar panels for UK business: the real options — capital allowances, the export tariff, regional grants and asset finance — and how they stack.